WIPC Instructor Pack - September 2021 [PDF]

Zitiervorschau

Well intervention pressure control Instructor pack September 2021

Introduction IWCF will shortly begin the introduction of a new assessment structure for the Well Intervention Pressure Control (WIPC) programme. This will impact the assessment content, timings and number of questions. This pack has been created to provide background information and support for all IWCF accredited WIPC instructors.

2

Multi-Tier Review Process Since 2019, IWCF has been reviewing and creating new questions that are role specific, relevant to the syllabi and incorporate previous assessment feedback. A visual of this process is represented below. All of these initiatives together have given us valuable feedback and data which we have used to create the new questions, ensuring they align with the syllabi. We will continue to use candidate and instructor feedback, as well as pass rate data to ensure we can monitor, maintain and update new questions where necessary.

3

Assessment Framework Following on from the review process, we will be introducing changes to our assessment framework. These changes will be introduced from Monday 29 November 2021. Previous feedback indicated that candidates would benefit from changes to the duration and structure of WIPC assessments. IWCF must balance the time per question with the overall assessment length. This means we have had to adjust the previously longer Completion Operations assessment to allow for the additional time applied to the optional modules. This also gives candidates the opportunity to receive a balance of questions across the various syllabus topics.

Module

Number of questions

Duration (minutes)

Completion Operations

30

60

Completion Equipment

30

60

Wireline

30

60

Coiled Tubing

30

60

Snubbing

30

60

Time per question

2 minutes

The new WIPC structure will also apply equal weighting (one point per question). This was successfully implemented into the drilling programme in 2017 and feedback suggests candidates and instructors support this approach. Equal weighting allows candidates a fairer opportunity to perform well over a balance of syllabus topics throughout the assessment.

4

Syllabi Updates Based on feedback, we will be making a few minor changes to the WIPC syllabi. IWCF do not expect centres to resubmit training materials – the changes relate mostly to minor terminology updates to ensure the syllabus is clear and consistent throughout. Please find the summary table below. Syllabus category

WI-SF-COM02.02.03

Level Update

Reason for update

4

Removal of the term ‘calculate’.

The WIPC syllabus does not require the calculation of MAASP.

Additional reference to quick test subs.

Candidates must understand the principles, how to analyse the source of abnormal annulus pressure and explain how to bring the pressure back to normal without compromising well integrity. Instructor feedback indicated this specific type of equipment could be highlighted.

Removal of ‘formation injectivity pressure’ and ‘leak off pressure’.

Quick test subs are commonly used PCE components improve operational safety. Previous text incorrectly indicated that the terms ‘leak off pressure’ and ‘formation injectivity pressure’ could be used interchangeably.

Updated to ‘formation injectivity test.’ Change in terminology from ‘blind/shear’ to ‘shear/seal’.

Previous text within this syllabus category was inconsistent.

WI-SF-COM02.03.04

3/4

WI-SF-COM04.02.01 WI-SF-COM03.04.01

3

WI-SF-COM08.05.02

4

WI-SF-SNO04.03.04

3/4

2/3/4

WI-SF-SNO02.02.01

2/3

WI-SF-SNO04.03.03 WI-SF-SNO04.03.04

3/4 3/4

Change from ‘stripper BOP’ to ‘upper and lower stripper rams’ Change ‘slip bowl’ to slips’

In line with the rest of the syllabus, this has been amended to ‘shear/seal’. Feedback suggests the revised text is more commonly used terminology.

‘Stripper BOP’ changed to ‘lower stripper rams’

Feedback suggests that the term ‘slips’ is more technically accurate than the previous term. There was inconsistency throughout the syllabus related to this term.

‘Safety BOP’ changed to ‘pipe rams/safety BOPs’

Feedback suggests the revised text is more commonly used terminology. The update ensures the pipe ram/safety BOPs are not confused for the safety head (which is a shear ram).

5

Syllabi Updates In the weeks ahead, the full syllabi will be updated and will be available on the IWCF website. We will inform you when the updated document is available for download. You can also find other useful WIPC resources on our website here. These include the following. Well Intervention Pressure Control Syllabi Guidance Document – this highlights the overall themes from our technical review process. It contains a table that highlights key syllabus areas that we strongly recommend training centres and instructors closely review. WIPC Guidance Video – this discusses the main syllabus changes, their importance and relevance to improving the overall WIPC programme.

6

Release Schedule IWCF will implement a phased process for introducing new content into the question bank. Feedback suggests training centres and instructors support this approach. This means as new questions are gradually added to the assessments, old questions will be gradually removed. Updates will be introduced in a phased approach with instructor support provided at each stage. The first scheduled update is the introduction of the new assessment structure on Monday 29 November 2021. The timeline for this process will be closely monitored to ensure instructors and centres are supported throughout the transition.

Phased release summary We will issue all instructors with a summary document before each phased release. This high-level summary will explain syllabus areas that will be introduced at each phase. IWCF will aim to introduce topics in a structured way across the levels however as there is a gradual approach, the introduction of questions for certain syllabus areas may be spread across one or more phases.

7

Assessment Questions Revised questions closely follow the progression between syllabus levels.      Level 2 questions focus on foundational knowledge and awareness.  Level 3 questions (operator level) focus on applying knowledge and skills.   Level 4 questions (supervisor level) focus both on applying knowledge and skills with an added focus on critical thinking and problem solving.  It is important to recognise that level 3 and 4 are different courses. They each contain elements that are appropriate for specific job roles and field experience. This aligns with the level guidance chart within IOGP 476, 2019. We share a responsibility to encourage candidates to take the correct level for their position. When candidates take the incorrect level for their job and experience, they may not fully benefit from the training and risk not passing their assessment. You can find the IOGP level guidance chart on our website.

8

Instructor Support

In line with the introduction of the new WIPC questions, IWCF will be providing additional support to instructors and centres. This includes the following initiatives.

Instructor newsletters LinkedIn group Additional reference materials New images Access to an instructor hub.

9

Instructor Newsletter Earlier this year, IWCF created a newsletter specifically for instructors and assessors. It aims to give you an insight into our feedback processes, industry updates and upcoming initiatives.  As the new WIPC questions become integrated into the assessment, IWCF will use this newsletter to highlight general themes of instructor and candidate feedback. If there are updates to any industry standards which will impact IWCF programmes, we will also use the newsletter to communicate this to instructors. The information in these updates aims to enhance your understanding of where candidates need additional support. Therefore we recommend you actively read and implement the recommendations sent to you within these communications. We recognise many instructors have their personal email addresses linked to their instructor accounts. If you also want to sign up with your work email, you can do so here.

LinkedIn Group IWCF has set up a WIPC instructor LinkedIn group as feedback suggests instructors would value a space where they could connect and share ideas. We will also post new resources into this group. You can join by clicking here. This platform is to connect and share knowledge. Any questions or for the IWCF team should be sent to [email protected].

10

Additional Reference Materials IWCF barrier terms and definitions This document summaries IWCF’s stance on barriers. The main principle is that two barriers must be present before breaking isolation. This is applicable to both the Drilling Well Control and WIPC programme. You can view the document in the learning resources section of the IWCF website here.

Formula sheets IWCF is planning to release an updated formula sheet. Due to the phased release of the questions, the current formula sheet will remain in use for the first phase of the project. We will communicate with all centres and instructors when an updated formula sheet is available. Current formula sheets are available to download on the IWCF website here.

Case study The 2019 case study (5 question reverse kill exercise) received a lot of feedback. We have continued to review this and in the short term, the existing case study in the CO assessment will remain. We will look to replace this in time however it will not be included in the first phased release. When it is re-introduced, we will look to provide additional support and resources to help prepare instructors and candidates.

11

New Images IWCF has developed a library of icons that each represent different components. They can be combined together to make custom diagrams to represent rig up configurations. The icons are simple, grey scale and non-manufacturer specific. They intend to aid understanding of specific scenarios described in IWCF questions rather than act as like-for-like representations of what candidates may see on location. This is important to ensure that they are suitable for our global candidate base. Updated diagram examples are shown below. All instructors will shortly be issued with a login to the Members Login Area where they can download the completed diagrams to familiarize themselves with the new images. Examples of individual icons

Example of combining icons to create a rig up

Weight indicator

Control panel

Stuffing box

12

Providing good quality feedback Instructor and candidate feedback is an important part of IWCF’s approach to developing our programmes and assessment content. Candidates can give feedback on individual questions by using the ‘flag’ function within the digital assessment. Candidates taking paper assessments can fill in a feedback form at the end of their assessment. Questions will be monitored, reviewed and, where required, updated over time. Clear and specific feedback is very important to allow us to investigate concerns quickly and efficiently. The examples below outline some clear, constructive feedback compared to vague or general comments that we cannot action. Please share these examples with your candidates to ensure feedback is provided to us that is clear and specific to ensure it is actionable.

Feedback IWCF cannot action: "The language in several questions confused me." This type of feedback does not indicate a question number or alert us to specific problems with language or terminology.

Feedback IWCF can action: “Question 31 relates to a surface scenario, but some of the answers refer to equipment only seen in a subsea environment. This could be confusing”. This feedback indicates a specific question with a clear reason to why the candidate feels the language is confusing.

13

Grading Analysis Sheet (GAS) The grading analysis sheet is a tool which allows candidates to see areas where they have failed to answer correctly. Instructors can support candidates by using the information within the GAS to cross reference the syllabus area. For example, the GAS shows the candidate the following information.

WI-SF-WLO-04.03.01

Loss of pressure What to do if there are defects control during well that could affect BOP function intervention operations during a wireline operation. WL.

Cross referencing the code with the syllabus shows further information, including a detailed bulleted list of topics included in this question bank category. As all questions are based on the syllabus learning outcome, this should advise the candidate of targeted areas for retraining and revision.

Contact us Please contact us by emailing [email protected] if you have any questions.

14