Mini Research Socio - Linguistic Politeness and Address Forms [PDF]

Zitiervorschau

CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION As part of our assessment for the subject „Introduction to Sociolinguistics‟, our group consisting of Nurul Zahidah binti Hassan PTM130723907, Zahidah Husna binti Zulkifli PTM130723486 and Farhana binti Abdul Hadi PTM130723631 conducted a research among third semester students of TESL (Teaching English as a Second Language) code BE101 regarding Politeness and Address Forms. Politeness in the English dictionary is defined as the quality of being civilized or wellmannered and address forms are ways of addressing the people around us. According to Janet Holmes‟ „An Introduction to Sociolinguistics‟, factors constraining the polite choice of address terms are age group, gender, status, setting, title and solidarity. The topic given to us is specified to „Degree of Politeness between Peers of Various Age Groups among BE101 Semester 3 Students in KPTMKL‟. Our research was conducted to investigate the factors that manipulate politeness and the different ways others address their peers of different age groups. Our questionnaire entitled, „Degree of Politeness between Peers of Various Age Groups among BE101 Semester 3 Students in KPTMKL‟ was distributed fairly among the third semester TESL students of Kolej Poly-Tech MARA Kuala Lumpur. We received an appropriate amount of responds and successfully drafted this report. This report contains the objective and findings of our investigation. Politeness and address forms play an important role in our daily lives, specifically our target respondents who range from college students who study in an environment of different people. They are inclined to interact with peers that vary from different age groups, genders, statuses and titles in different settings.

1

CHAPTER TWO: OBJECTIVES In order to do a research, we have to identify what are the objectives or purpose of our research. For our research entitled: Degree of Politeness between Peers of Various Age Groups among BE101 Semester 3 Students in KPTMKL, we come up with several objectives and research questions. The main objective of the study is to analyse the BE101 Semester 3 students‟ perception of the degree of politeness between peers of various age group. The more specific objectives of the study are to identify students‟ perception regarding politeness between peers of various age groups. Besides that, we also want to determine how does politeness influence students‟ behaviour towards their peers from different age group and the factors that influence the degree of politeness among students with their peers from different age. With the objectives identified, two fundamental research questions are addressed by this study in order to achieve the objectives of our research. The first question is does age group plays an important role in the degree of politeness between peers. We came up with the question because we want to identify if age affects the degree of politeness between older peers. The second question is; what are the factors that determine the degree of politeness in different age. This is because we want to find out if the factors presented by Janet Holmes are the same as our results or not. In conclusion, these objectives and research questions are the backbone of our research and the key for us to determine an appropriate method to conduct our research.

2

CHAPTER THREE: METHODOLOGY The type of research that is used in this research is quantitative research. Quantitative research is a research that method that is used to obtain data via statistical, mathematical or numerical data in order to investigate a phenomenon. Quantitative research is suitable to be used for our research as we want to find out what does the students think about politeness between their older peers, how it influence their behaviour, and the factors that may influence their degree of politeness with their older peers. Besides that, quantitative research provides the fundamental connection between empirical observation and mathematical expression of quantitative relationship. The respondents in this research will all be coming from Kolej Poly-tech Mara Kuala Lumpur (KPTMKL), specifically semester 3 students from Diploma of TESL (Teaching English as a Second Language). We chose 30 semester 3 students 3 from Diploma of TESL because of their education background. Simply put, they are Sociolinguistics students and they can provide us the answers we are looking for. Besides that, they are at the most suitable age group for the research which is nineteen years old. It fits our criteria of a respondent since we are looking for respondent who have friends older than their age. A questionnaire was created in order to find out about the demographic background of the respondents. It also has questions related to their peers‟ age and have they ever experienced communication or language barrier when they are talking to their older friends. Besides that, there is also questions regarding factors that might influence their behaviour, how they address their older friends, why they choose to respect their older peers and a statement or a quote about respecting people who are older than you.

3

CHAPTER FOUR: FINDINGS Background of respondents

Total Number of Respondents based on Gender Total Number of Respondents

16 14 12 10 8

Male

6

Female

4 2 0 Gender

GRAPH 1: Total Number of Respondents Based on Gender In completing our research regarding the „Degree of Politeness between Peers of Various Age Groups among BE101 Semester 3 Students in Kolej Poly-Tech Mara (KPTMKL)‟, we had gone through the questionnaires done by 30 students‟ altogether, all of whom are BE101 Semester 3 students in KPTMKL. In this small-scale research, the 30 respondents mentioned above; is comprised of a total of 15 male and 15 female. Hence, we can say that the number of respondents is this research based upon gender is equal; leading us onto a percentage of 50% male to 50% female in regards of the total number of respondents in this particular research.

4

SECTION A QUESTION 1: How old are you?

Age of Respondents Total No. of Respondents

16 14 12 10 8

Male

6

Female

4 2 0 18-20 Years Old

21-23 Years Old

24-26 Years Old Above 26 Years Old Age

GRAPH 2: Age of Respondents In order to find out the age of our respondents, we created a question in our questionnaire that can help us to determine the age of the respondents. Based upon graph 2, 13 of the male respondents are within the range of age 18 until 20 years old. The remaining 2 of the male respondents are within the range of age 21 until 23 years old. For the female respondents, 14 of the female respondents are within the range of age from 18 until 20 years old. Meanwhile, the remaining 1 of the 15 female respondents is within the range of age 21 until 23 years old. None of the respondents are within the range of age between 24 until above 26 years old. Overall, 27 out of 30 respondents are within the range of age from 18 until 20 years old and 3 out of 30 respondents are within the range of age of 21 until 24 years old.

5

QUESTION 2: How old are your peers?

Group of Peers based on Age 14

Total No. of Respondents

12 10 8 Male

6

Female

4 2 0 18-20 Years Old

21-23 Years Old

24-26 YearsOld

Above 26 Years Old

Age of Peers

GRAPH 3: Group of Peers based on Age In order to find out the age of our respondents‟ peers, we come out with a question that can help us to determine their age. Based on graph 3, 13 of the male respondents have a group of peers within the range of age from 18 until 20 years old, while the other 2 of male respondents have groups of peers within the range of age from 21 until 23 years old. For female respondents, 12 of the respondents have groups of peers within the range of age from 18 until 20 years old whilst the other 3 of the female respondents have groups of peers within the range of age from 21 until 23 years old. None of the respondents have groups of peers from the range of age from 24 until above 26 years old. Overall, 25 out of 30 of the respondents have groups of peers from within the range of age 18 until 20 years old, and; 5 out of the total respondents have groups of peers within the range of age from 21 until 23 years old.

6

QUESTION 3: Do you have friends who are older than you?

Respondents' Opinion if They Have Friends who are Older than Them 10

No. of Respondents

9 8 7 6 5

Male

4

Female

3 2 1 0 Yes

No Responds

GRAPH 4: Respondents’ Opinion if They Have Friends who are Older than Them In order to find out the respondents‟ opinion if they have friends who are older than them, we put it as a yes/no question in our questionnaire. Based on graph 4, 9 of the male respondents say that they indeed; do have friends who are older than them whilst the other 6 of the male respondents say the opposite- which is: No. Equally, 9 of the female respondents also say that they do have friends who are older than their age while, the other 6 of the female respondents say „no‟ to the question. Overall, 18 of the total respondents says „yes‟ that they have friends who are older than them while the other 12 says that they do not have friends who are older than them.

7

QUESTION 4: Have you ever experienced communication barrier due to differences in age?

Respondents' Opinions Regarding Experiencing Communication Barrier Due to Ages' Differences Total No. of Respondents

12 10 8 6

Male

4

Female

2 0 Yes

No Responds

GRAPH 5: Respondents’ Opinion Regarding Experiencing Communication Barrier due to Ages’ Differences In order to find out if the respondents ever experienced communication or language barrier when they communicate with peers who are older than them, we created a yes/no question to help us get an answer for it. Based on graph 5, 9 of male respondents say that they have experienced communication barrier which had occurred due to age‟s differences, whilst the other 6 of male respondents say that they have never came across communication barrier due to age‟s difference. For female respondents, 5 out of 15 respondents say that they have experienced communication barrier due to age‟s difference whilst the other 10 of the female respondents say otherwise.

8

QUESTION 4(A): If you do, please explain why.

Causes of Communication's Barrier 7 Total No. of Respondents

6 5 4 Male

3

Female

2 1 0 Age Differences

Difficult to Interact Causes

GRAPH 6: Causes of Communication Barrier This question is a continuation from Question 4 in Part A. In this question, we asked the respondents who answered „yes‟ in Question 4 to give reasons why or what do they think are the causes for them to experience language barrier with their older peers. Based on graph 6, 3 of the male respondents who have experienced communication barriers due to age‟s difference say that they experienced such barrier mainly because of the age difference, especially ones who are older than them. The other remaining 6 of the male respondents who have experienced communication barrier due to age‟s difference say that they faced such experience because they find it difficult to interact with those who are older than them. They felt awkward because they felt that they cannot really relate to the way those who are older than them communicate, hence; causing them to have difficulties in interacting with those who are older. For female respondents, all 5 of those who have experienced communication barrier due to age‟s difference basically have the similar reasons to the male respondents: they experienced such barrier mainly because they feel the need to respect them. From these, we can see that majority of male respondents faced such barrier because of difficulties in interacting to those who are older, whilst majority of female respondents faced the barrier due to the age difference. 9

QUESTION 5: How do you address peers older than you?

Ways in Addressing Older Peers Total No. of Respondents

12 10 8 6

Male Female

4 2 0 Name According to Age/Status

First Name Basis Ways

GRAPH 7: Ways in Addressing Older Peers In order to find out on how the respondents address their older peers, we created this question to help us determine if age and status play an important role in linguistic politeness and address form. Based on graph 7, 9 of the male respondents preferred to address their older peers according to their age or status which are: „abang‟, „kakak‟ or „bro‟; while the remainder 6 of the male respondents preferred to address them using their first name basis. For female respondents, 10 of the female respondents preferred to address their older peers according to their age or status- those which are similar to that of male respondents; while the other 6 of the female respondents preferred to call their older peers using the first name basis. From these findings, we can see that majority of male and female respondents preferred to use name‟s status when addressing their older peers.

10

QUESTION 6: “Respect those who are older than you” Do you agree with this statement? If you do/do not agree, please explain why.

Opinions regarding statement: "Respect those who are older than you" Total No. of Respondents

16 14 12 10 8

Male

6

Female

4 2 0 Agree

Disagree Opinions

GRAPH 8: Opinions regarding Statement: “Respect those who are older than you” For this question, we give the respondents a statement “Respect those who are older than you” to identify if the respondents agree or disagree with the statement. They also have to give reason(s) why they agree or disagree with the statement. Based on graph 8, 14 out of 15 respondents for both male and female respondents respectively agree to the statement: “Respect those who are older than you” whilst the other 1 of both male and female respondents, respectively disagree to the statement. Thus, we can see there that majority of male and female respondents agree to the fact that people should respect those who are older than them, whilst minority of 1 respondent respectively; from both male and female respondents disagree to such statement.

11

Reasons given by respondents for agreeing with the statement

Total No. of Respondents

Reasons to Agree to the Statement: "Respect those who are older than you" 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

Male Female

Upbringing

Culture

Religion

Age

Reasons

GRAPH 9: Reasons to Agree to the statement: “Respect those who are older than you” This graph represented those who agree with the statement in Question 6. Based on graph 9, 8 of male respondents and 7 of the female respondents who agree to the statement “Respect those who are older than you” described that they had agreed to such statement because of their upbringing. They were taught and educated in a family which inclined them to respect people, especially those who are older than them despite whoever they are. Whilst 2 of the remainder male respondents and 3 of the female respondents described that their culture had moulded them onto respecting those who are older than them. 2 of the other male respondents and 3 of the female respondents described how they respect people, especially those who are older than them; because of their religion. Their religion had taught them to respect people, no matter who they are; what more those who are of older age than them. Meanwhile, the last 2 of the overall male respondents and 1 of the overall female respondents agree to such statement because of the age factor. For them; as long as the person is older than them, they feel that they are obligated to respect them. From these findings, we can see that majority of both male and female respondents agreed to the statement because of their upbringing. Hence, we can say that for both male and female respondents; upbringing factor plays a large role in making them agreed to the statement that “People should respect those who are older than them”. 12

Reasons given by respondents who disagree with the statement

Reasons to Disagree to the Statement: "Respect those who are older than you" 1.2

No. of Respondents

1 0.8 0.6

Male

0.4

Female

0.2 0 Age is just a number Reason

GRAPH 10: Reasons to Disagree to the Statement: “Respect those who are older than you” This graph represented those who disagree with the statement in Question 6. Based on graph 10, we can see that the respective number of 1 respondent from both male and female respondents does not agree to the statement that people should respect the other people who are older than them because they feel that age is just a number. If they feel that the person deserves respect from them, than they will gladly give it to those who deserved it. They described that people should gain respect; not because of how old they are, but; who they are as a person. Thus, we can see here that equal number of male and female respondent have disagreed to the statement because they feel that age is just a number.

13

QUESTION 7: A. Ali respects peers who are older than him. B. Lisa does not give special treatment to peers older than her. She treats them equally. C. Abu disrespects peers older than him. Why do you think situation A, B and C occur? Explain.

Opinions Regarding Situations A, B and C 8

Total No. of Respondents

7 6 5 4

Male

3

Female

2 1 0 Language Barrier

Politeness

Personality

Perspective

Environment

Opinions

GRAPH 11: Opinions Regarding Situation A, B and C. For the final question for Part A in our questionnaire, we come out with a situation based question. This question is created to find out the respondents opinion on three different situations. Based on graph 11, 3 of the male respondents and 4 of female respondents explained that situation A, B and C had occurred due to language barrier. They explained how A, B and C might have occurred due to miscommunication and problems faced by the speaker in interacting with peers who are older than them. 3 of the male respondents explained that situations above might have occurred due to politeness. They described how a certain person have a higher level of politeness in comparison to the other, and this factor thus causes him or her to behave the way they do to peers who are older than them.

14

7 of male respondents and 5 of female respondents explained that such situations occurred due to the personality of the speakers- in which are moulded by the persons‟ religion, culture and background in terms of his or her family. 2 of the remainder male respondents explained how situation A, B and C might have occurred due to their different perspective in regards of how they view the peers who are older than them. Whilst, 6 of the remainder female respondents explained how situations above might have occurred due to their environmental factor. The people they interact with and the place they stayed in might have influenced them to behave the way they do to peers who are older than them. Hence, based on the findings, we can see how majority of the male respondents think that situations above might have occurred due to the personality of the speaker. Meanwhile, majority of the female respondents think that situations have occurred due to environmental factor.

15

SECTION B QUESTION 1: Does your culture or religion teach you to respect people who are older than you?

Opinions If Religions And Cultures Teach Respect to People Who Are Older Total No. of Respondents

16 14 12 10 8

Male

6

Female

4 2 0 Yes

No Responds

GRAPH 12: Opinions if Religion and Cultures Teach Respect to People Who are Older In order to find out what are the factors that determine the degree of politeness, we come out with section B in our questionnaire which consists of 5 questions to help us determine the factors. For Question 1 we asked the respondents whether their religion or culture teaches them to respect people who are older than them. Based on graph 12, the equal number of 14 respondents; respectively from both male and female respondents, have agreed that religions and cultures indeed; teach respect to people who are older. Meanwhile, 1 respondent; respectively from both male and female respondents disagreed that religions and cultures teach people to respect those who are older than them. From the findings, we can see how majority of both male and female respondents agreed that religions and cultures indeed teach ones to respect people who are older than them.

16

QUESTION 2: Why do you choose to respect peers who are older than you? Explain.

Reasons in Choosing to Respect the Older Peers 14 Total No. of Respondents

12 10 8 Male

6

Female

4 2 0 Cultures

Educations Reasons

GRAPH 13: Reasons in Choosing to Respect the Older Peers For Question 2, we asked the respondents the reasons behind their choice to respect their older peers. Based on graph 13, 13 of the male respondents and 12 of the female respondents described that they chose to respect those who are older than them because their cultures have moulded them to do so. On the other hand, 2 of the male respondents and 3 of the female respondents described that they chose to respect peers who are older than them because they have been educated to respect people regardless of who they are, because of that; they chose to respect peers who are older than them. Thus, from the findings, we can see how majority of male and female respondents described that they chose to respect peers who are older because of their cultures‟ teaching.

17

QUESTION 3: Do you think environment can affect the degree of politeness?

Opinions if Environment can Affect People's Degree of Politeness Total No. of Respondents

16 14 12 10 8

Male

6

Female

4 2 0 Yes

No Opinion

GRAPH 14: Opinions if Environment can affect People’s Degree of Politeness For Question 3, we want to find out if environment affect peoples‟ degree of politeness. IN order to do so, we asked our respondents to give their opinion about this matter. Based on graph 14, all 15 respondents from respectively male and female respondents agreed that environment can affect people‟s degree of politeness. None of the respondents from neither male nor female respondents disagreed that opinions can affect people‟s degree of politeness. Hence, based on the findings; we can see that majority of both male and female respondents agreed that environment indeed can affect people‟s degree of politeness.

18

QUESTION 4: If you do/ do not think so, explain.

Reasons On Why Environment Can Affect People's Degree Of Politeness 10 Total No. of Respondents

9 8 7 6 5

Male

4

Female

3 2 1 0 Surroundings

Level of Education Reasons

GRAPH 15: Reasons on Why Environment can Affect People’s Degree of Politeness This question is continuity from Question 3. For this question, we asked the respondents to give reasons why they say yes or no in Question 3. Based on graph 15, 8 of male respondents and 9 of female respondents described that ones‟ surrounding can always affect people‟s degree of politeness. They explained how ones‟ surroundings- cultures, family, society, religion- affect ones‟ degree of politeness. If their surroundings emphasized politeness in their everyday life; then there is a high probability that they are going to be people with high degree of politeness as they grow up. Meanwhile, 3 of male respondents and 6 of female respondents described that people‟s level of education, in a way; affect their degree of politeness towards the other people. They explained how ones‟ level of education more often than not; affect their degree of politeness. They described how people of lower education usually got less exposure on the importance of politeness and certain degree of politeness that one person should be aware of; hence leading them onto having lower degree of politeness. Nevertheless, based on the findings above, we can see how majority of respondents- male and female- has come onto an understanding that surroundings is the reason why environment can affect people‟s degree of politeness.

19

QUESTION 5: What are the factors do you think affect the way you communicate with your friends who are older than you?

Factors That May Affect The Way Of Communicating With Friends Who Are Older Total No. of Respondents

7 6 5 4 3

Male

2

Female

1 0 Culture

Age

Upbringing

Factors

GRAPH 16: Factors that may affect the Way of Communicating with Friends who are Older In order to find out what are the other factors that can affect the way people communicating with older peers, we asked the respondents to provide other reasons that they think can affect the way they talk to their older peers. Based on graph 16, 4 of male respondents and 5 of female respondents think that culture is the factor that affects the way they communicate with friends who are older than them. Meanwhile, the other 5 of male respondents and 4 of female respondents think that age is the factor which affects the way they communicate with their friends- ones who are older than them. Whilst the remaining 6 of both male and female respondents respectively; think that their upbringing – which is comprised of religion, culture and family background- affect the way they communicate with friends who are older than them. Based on the findings; obviously, majority of the respondents, from both male and female; think that their upbringing is the factor that affect the way they communicate with friends who are older than them.

20

CHAPTER FIVE: DISCUSSIONS The main objective of this research is to identify what the student thinks about politeness between peers of various age groups. We want to know how age influences the students‟ behaviour towards their older peers. As a whole, the findings of this mini-research show that age for both male and female does play an important role in the degree of politeness between peers. This can be seen on graph 8; we can clearly see how majority of both male and female perceive that people should respect those who are older than them. This thus indicates to us how our respondents perceive that age indeed plays an important role in the degree of politeness between peers. We could see in graph 5 and graph 6 that majority of 9 over 15 of male respondents, beating a total of 5 from female respondents; say that they faced communication barrier when they communicate with peers who are older than them; 3 of whom stated that it was because of their age difference and 6 stated that they find it difficult to interact with peers who are older than them. Whilst all 5 of the female respondents stated that they faced communication barrier because they feel the need to respect peers who are older than them. This shows that male perceive differences in age between peers as a wall, a barrier that makes it difficult for them to actually communicate properly with the older peers; whilst for female- the need to respect those who are older than them despite them being their peers caused them to face such communication barrier. Thus, we can indeed say that age does influence the students‟ behaviour towards their older peers- well, in this case- in terms of communication. And; apparently, it turns up that male faced such difficulties more so than female. From our research, we have found out that female respondents display higher degree of negative politeness in terms of address form towards their older peers compared to male respondents. This is because female has higher number of older peers compared to male as shown in Graph 3 from our findings. According to our findings, female address their older peers by their age status such as kak or abang while male are more comfortable addressing their older peers by first name basis. This shows that female displays negative politeness more than male as shown in Graph 7 from our findings. Hence, in terms of addressing their older peers, we could definitely say that female indeed display higher degree of negative politeness in comparison to male.

21

Holmes‟ theories in „Introduction to Sociolinguistic‟ which encircled around the topic: politeness and address forms clearly emphasized that being polite means getting the linguistic expression of social distance right as far as your addressee is concerned. Social status- in our research‟s case- is referred to as differences in age. The older ones are usually referred to as seniors or ones of higher status than the younger ones in our society; specifically in KPTMKL. Whereas in terms of linguistic expression, more often than not; in our society it is referred to address form such as kakak, abang, pak cik or even first name‟s basis. We could see from our research that even though majority of both male and female agree that people should respect ones who are older than them, female display higher negative politeness in terms of address forms while male faced more communication barrier than that of female‟s. Holmes described that some social dialectologists suggested that women were status conscious, and that this explained their use of standard speech forms (see Chapter 7). It explains why we found out that female displays higher negative politeness in terms of address forms. Holmes also described how male do not force their utterances as women do; indicating to us how male have more barrier in terms of communication which is different than that of women‟s and this; in a way, explains why we found out that male faced more communication barriers than female. All in all, in regards of our first objective, we could say that our result is in accordance to Janet Holmes‟ explanations in „Introduction of Sociolinguistic‟. The second objective of this research is to identify what are the factors affecting degree of politeness in different age group. The first factors that we find are religion and culture. Based on our research, both male and female respondents agree that religion and culture are the factors that affect their interaction with older peers. This is because religion and culture in Malaysia emphasise on respecting older people. This factor is supported by our findings in Graph 12 and Graph 13. The second factor affecting the degree of politeness is environment. This is because environment can make us change the way we speak to anyone we came in contact with. This statement is supported by our findings in Graph 14. According to Graph 16, other factors that may influence a person‟s degree of politeness are culture, upbringing and age. The factors however, are not in accordance with what Janet Holmes claimed in her book. The only factors that are the same as the theory are of age and marked setting. Based from our understanding, all of us agree that the factors affecting the degree of politeness may be different from the theory because the factors that are presented by Janet Holmes; are found

22

based upon the British society. In Malaysia, our societies are made up of several different races, cultures and religions; factors which apparently play important roles in address form. In order to improve our research, we think that this mini-research could be extended to include the respondents‟ race and religion in order for us to get more accurate result regarding the factors that could affect the address form between peers of different ages.

23

CHAPTER SIX: CONCLUSION Based on the objectives stated at the beginning of the research which in in Chapter One and the findings and discussion presented in Chapter Four and Chapter Five, here are some recaps on what we have learned from our research. We found out that female show more negative politeness towards their older peers compared to male due to their higher number of older peers compared to male, as stated in our discussion before. Looking back in theories presented by Janet Holmes; she said that ‘the symbolic value of speech is often more important for the girls than the boys. In these communities, specific linguistic forms may signal membership of the group ‘male’ or ‘female’ in particular’. Kakak or abang; we found out that these are symbolic value of speech used by female in our research, a specific linguistic forms particularly; which are used by them to signal membership to other group of male or female which are older than them. We also found different perceptions by our respondents regarding how age actually influence the way they behave or communicate with their peers. Despite having lower negative politeness than female, we found out that male faced more communication barriers in terms of communicating with peers who are older than them. Hence, we can say that our findings which encircled around the first objective of our research are in accordance to ones presented by Holmes in „An Introduction to Sociolinguistic‟. However, we also found out that the factors that we have found based upon our research turns out to be slightly different from neither what we have learned nor expected. Based upon our research, we found out that cultures and religions turns out to be the highest forms of influence to our respondents in regards of how they address their peers who are older; followed by environment as well as culture, upbringing and age. Holmes stressed upon the factors of solidarity, type of relationship and social distance, as well as age and marked settings. The only factors we have found out which are in accordance to ones presented by Holmes are those regarding age and marked settings. Thus, we cannot say that our findings which encircled around our second objective of our research are exactly in accordance Holmes‟ theories regarding factors affecting politeness and address forms. Interestingly though, Holmes did say that in many eastern societies, being polite in terms of address forms is often a complex linguistic matter. Often enough; they have some extra factors which are irrelevant in many English-speaking societies these days. Due to this reason, we have come onto a conclusion

24

that factors which we have found in our research may differ from ones emphasized by Holmes due to differences in terms of the society. All in all, answering back the fundamental research questions: does age group plays an important role in the degree of politeness between peers? What are the factors that determine the degree of politeness between peers of different age? The answers are: yes, age does play an important role in the degree of politeness between peers, and; the factors that we have found out based on our research are: culture and religion, environment, as well as culture, upbringing and age. Even though we manage to determine that age and gender indeed does play an important role in the degree of politeness and address forms between peers, also; finding the factors affecting the degree of politeness, we still think that the result for our mini-research is still inconclusive. Yes; our results might slightly differ from ones presented by Holmes in what we have learned, but, we have stated reason that might lead us onto such differences in above explanations. Nevertheless, we know that our reason might not be enough. This is because the number of respondents who answered the questionnaire, although is enough to meet the requirement for this mini-research; is not enough to support our theory regarding this matter.

25

APPENDIX

26