50 0 372KB
TaskaBella Inc
GROUP 1 - SECTION B KRUTHIK REDDY – 19PGP076MITHUN CHANDAR -19PGP082NARENDRAKATTA – 19PGP090SINDHUJA REDDY – 19PGP110
[Cite your source here.]
Q.1 Was the advertising campaign effective?
Did the additional consumers convert as a result of the ad campaign?
Users
Not Exposed to Ads
Exposed to Ads
23104
550154
573258
420
14423
14843
23524
564577
588101
Not Converted Converted Grand Total
User Condition
Grand Total
Conversion Rate
Exposed to Ad
2.55%
Not Exposed to Ad
1.79%
Increase in converted users: 2.55% - 1.79% = 0.76% increase in converted users with the ad
Q.2. Was the campaign profitable?
2.A How much more money did TaskaBella make by running the campaign (excluding the advertising cost)? It is given in the case that each converted customer is worth $40. Total no of exposed users = 564,577 (from CSV) % conversion rate of exposed group= 2.55% (from Q.1) % conversion rate of control group =1.79% (from Q.1) % increase in converted users with the ad = 2.55%-1.79%=0.76% More money did TaskaBella made by running the campaign = (worth of converted user) *(no of exposed users)*( increase in converted users with the ad) =$40*564,577*0.76% =$173,719 More money did TaskaBella made by running the campaign= $173,719
2.B What was the cost of the campaign? It is given in the case that CPM is $9. Total no of impressions= 14597182 (from CSV) Total cost of advertising = $9 * 14597182 / 1000 = $1,31,374.38 2.C Calculate the ROI of the campaign. Was the campaign profitable? Total cost of advertising = $1,31,374.64 Profit generated from each sale = $40 No. of conversions required to breakeven the advertising cost = $1,31,374.64 / $40 = 3284.366 ~ 3285 conversions to be made Total no. of conversions made = 14843 Hence, as the actual number of conversions made were more than the breakeven, the campaign was profitable. Rocket Fuel has shown that there is an addition of 0.76% in the conversion rate due to the advertising campaign (From Q1). Current 2.55% conversion rate corresponds to 14843 conversions and a profit of $4,62,345.36 Estimated Total Users = 588101 Additional Conversions created due to the ad campaign = 588101*0.76% = 4470 Additional Profit obtained due to the additional conversions = ($4,62,345.36/2.55%) *0.76% = $137797.05 As the additional profit obtained because of running the ad campaign exceeds the total advertising cost, the campaign is profitable. ROI of the campaign = (Net Profit/Cost of investment) *100 = ($1,37,797.05 - $1,31,374.64)/ $1,31,374.64 * 100 = 4.89% 2.D What was the opportunity cost of including a control group; how much more could have TaskaBella made with a smaller control group or not having a control group at all?
Users
Exposed to Ads
Not Exposed to Ads
Total
Converted
14,423
420
14,843
Not Converted
550,154
23,104
573,258
Total
564,577
23,524
588,101
Conversion rate in the exposed group = (14423/564577) *100 = 2.55% Conversion rate in controlled group = (420/23524) *100 = 1.79% Due to the inclusion of a controlled group, TaskaBella Inc is losing out on 2.55% - 1.79% = 0.76% of the conversions which can be considered as the opportunity cost. No. of conversions lost = 0.76% of 23524 = 179 conversions lost Total Opportunity Cost of having a control group = 179*40 = $7160 However, if there is no control group, then TaskaBella will not have any reference data on how many customers will buy the new handbag without digital ads. Results of the control group will also serve as a measure of the effectivity of TaskaBella’s current digital marketing efforts.
Q3. How did the number of impressions seen by each user influence the effectiveness of advertising?
3.A Create a chart of conversion rates as a function of the number of ads displayed to the users. Plot conversion rates for those who were in the control group and for those who were exposed to the ad. Group together number of impressions as necessary to obtain a meaningful plot. (Conversion rate means the percentage of unique users who made a purchase) The impressions are grouped in the range of 100. For each range, the total number of Ad impressions for the exposed group, the number of converted users, and the conversion rates is tabulated
A graph is plotted with the conversion rate against the number of impressions for the focused group.
Conversion Rate of Exposed Group 1.20 1.00
Conversion Rate
0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 00 10 20 30 40 50 70 80 10 1- 01- 01- 01- 01- 01- 01- 01- 01- 1-1 1-1 1-1 1-1 1-1 1-1 1-1 1-1 1-2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 90 00 10 20 30 40 60 70 00 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2
Impression Range
The impressions are grouped in the range of 100. For each range, the total number of Ad impressions for the control group, the number of converted users and the conversion rate is tabulated
A graph is plotted with the obtained conversion rate against the number of impressions for the control group
Conversion Rate
Conversion Rate of Contol Group 0.20 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.10 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.00
1-100 101- 201- 301- 401- 501- 601- 701- 801- 901200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
Impression Range
3.B What can you infer from the charts? In what region is advertising most effective?
For the exposed group, the conversion rate is directly proportional to the number of impressions i.e the conversion rate increases as the number of impressions increases.
On average, for the control group also the conversion rate increases as the number of impressions increases. Exposure to more than 600 impressions doesn’t have any impact of conversions and the conversion rate becomes zero.
For those exposed to ads, the most effective number of impressions is between 1701 to 1800 impressions per user
The optimal for those in the control group is between 201-300 impressions.
3.C What do the above figures imply for the design of the next campaign assuming that consumer response would be similar?
An increase in the number of ad impressions gives a positive result as the conversion rate is 100%. But for the control group, the number of impressions should not exceed a limit as it will not lead to any conversions.
Q.4 How does consumer response to advertising vary on different days of the week and at different times of the day?
4.A Create a chart with the conversion rates for the control group and the exposed group as a function of the day of the week when they were shown the most impressions. The total number of unique users who viewed the ads on a day of the week is mentioned in the table below. The table contains data of both the exposed group, and the control group.
Total Impressions Mo n
Tue
Exposed Group
83571
74572
Control Group
3502
2907
Wed
Thu
7741 8 3490
79077 3905
Fri 8880 5 3803
Sat
Sun
78802
82332
2858
3059
The total number of converted users on the day of the week is mentioned in the table below. The table contains data of both the exposed group and the control group. Conversions
Exposed Group Control Group
Mo n 277 8 79
Tue
Wed
2270
1963
42
55
Thu 171 1 78
Fri
Sat
Sun
1995
1679
2027
62
40
63
The conversion rate is calculated for both the exposed group, and the control group. Conversion rate means the percentage of unique users who made a purchase, which is indicated as percentage below.
Exposed Group Control Group
Mon 3.32 4 2.25 6
Tue 3.04 4 1.44 5
Conversion rates (in %) Wed Thu 2.53 2.16 6 4 1.57 1.99 6 7
Fri 2.24 6 1.63 0
Sat 2.13 1 1.40 0
The obtained data of conversion rates is plotted in bar graphs separately for both the exposed group and the control group.
Sun 2.46 2 2.05 9
Exposed Group % Conversion Rate
3.500% 3.324% 3.000% 2.500% 2.000% 1.500% 1.000% 0.500% 0.000% 1
3.044% 2.536%
2
2.164%
2.246%
2.131%
4
5
6
3
2.462%
7
Day of the week
Control Group 2.500%
2.256%
% Conversion Rate
2.059%
1.997%
2.000% 1.445%
1.500%
1.630%
1.576%
1.400%
1.000% 0.500% 0.000%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
4.B Create the same chart for hours within a day (excluding the period between midnight and 8 am). The total number of unique users who viewed the ads in an hour of the day is mentioned in the table below. The table contains data of both the exposed group and the control group. The total number of converted users in an hour of the day is mentioned in the table below. The table contains data of both the exposed group and the control group.
Exposed Group Control Group
8 16968 659
9 29802 1202
10 37454 1485
11 44149 2061
12 45238 2060
13 45485 2170
Impressions 14 15 43779 42855 1869 1828
16 35963 1604
17 33605 1383
18 31052 1271
19 29169 1183
20 27846 1077
21 28895 1081
22 25515 917
23 19547 619
20 843 19
21 843 23
22 675 15
23 449 8
The conversion rate is calculated for both the exposed group, and the control group.
Exposed Group Control Group
8 337 7
9 582 13
10 818 20
11 992 30
12 1092 35
13 1140 36
Conversions 14 15 1251 1279 30 46
16 1111 45
17 959 28
18 853 32
19 782 29
The obtained data of conversion rates is plotted in bar graphs separately for both the exposed group and the control group.
Conversion rates 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Exposed Group 1.986% 1.953% 2.184% 2.247% 2.414% 2.506% 2.858% 2.984% 3.089% 2.854% 2.747% 2.681% 3.027% 2.917% 2.646% 2.297% Control Group 1.062% 1.082% 1.347% 1.456% 1.699% 1.659% 1.605% 2.516% 2.805% 2.025% 2.518% 2.451% 1.764% 2.128% 1.636% 1.292%
Exposed Group 3.500%
%Conversion Rate
3.000%
2.858% 2.414%
2.500% 2.000%
2.984%
3.089%
3.027% 2.854%
2.917%
2.747% 2.681%
2.646%
2.506%
2.297%
2.184% 2.247% 1.986% 1.953%
1.500% 1.000% 0.500% 0.000%
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Hour of the day
Control Group 3.000%
2.805% 2.516%
%Coversion Rate
2.500%
2.518% 2.451% 2.128%
2.025%
2.000%
1.764%
1.699% 1.659% 1.605%
1.500%
1.347%
1.636%
1.456% 1.292%
1.062% 1.082%
1.000% 0.500% 0.000%
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Hour of the day
4.C What days/ hours is advertising most / least effective? From the data mentioned in 4(a) and 4(b):
Most effective day
Least effective day
Exposed Group
Monday
Saturday
Control Group
Monday
Saturday
16
Most effective hour
Least effective hour
Exposed Group
16
9
Control Group
16
8