Fabiessi and Camille-1 [PDF]

Zitiervorschau

Who? People Dimension 1. Personal relationships (a) Fabiessi’s HRD and Camille Drouel met year ago during specialized forum and as Camille could get by in Italian, he got along well with Fabiessi’s HRD. 2. Mandate (a) For Camille, improving financial situation without jeoparadizing personal image as designer. (b) For Fabiessi’s HRD, needs designer for the post of Fabiessi’s “Head of Design office” which is needed to modernize its product line as far as possible. 3. Stakeholders (a) For Camille Drouel (i) Management side of Camille’s startup (ii) Promotion and Public relation dept (iii) Bank (b) For Fabiessi’s HRD (i) Management of Fabiessi (ii) Design of product development team What? Problem Dimension 1. Motivations (a) For Camille, to improve financial condition as better as possible to support financial commitments and obviously to get hired for job. (b) For Fabiessi’s HRD, to get best designer suitable for the position to enhance Fabiessi’s brand name. 2. Justifications (a) Starting as an entrepreneur and achieved lots of success and paid attention in all forums, people called him as “the future philippe starck” (b) For Fabiessi’s HRD, they have put lots of efforts in high quality positioning leading to creativity efforts in design. 3. Solutions put in the table: (a) By Camille Drouel, solution to get the job as per his prior experience to enhance brand name of his startup which will help Fabiessi’s brand enhancement and also from financial part, getting adequate pay may be $5000 a month to enhance his startup from failing. (b) By Fabiessi’s HRD, solution to get experienced designer who could bring creativity in designing of product line and to reduce cost of hiring as far as possible. 4. Solutions away from table: (a) To maintain long term relationship from both side (b) To help each other to enhance brand name of both Fabiessi’s and Camille’s startup.

How? Process? 1. Organisation: Organisation involved here are Camille Douel’s Startup and HRD’s Fabiessi. 2. Communication (a) Both the parties can go for creating value or integrative negotiation. (b) For Camille it’s better to get more information about Fabiessi to align his competency with the needs of organisation. (c) Both the parties should follow their mandates and both should maintain reciprocity. (d) For Fabiessi’s HRD, if he is not convinced with Camille’s statement he should provide justifications while Camille should have strong BATNA to counter it. (e) Both the parties should have their objectives, priorities clear to reach mutually satisfied agreement. 3. Logistics: In Paris, may be Camille can call Fabiessi’s HRD and book some place which can be satisfied to both parties and comfortable to discuss.