Comparison of The SD-WAN Vendor Solutions - NETMANIAS [PDF]

Zitiervorschau

Login | Register FREE! | English | Korean | About Us

Search

   

 

Home | Reports | Technical Documents | Tech-Blog | One-Shot Gallery | Korea ICT News | Korea Communica on Market Data | List of Contributors | Become a Contrib Sec on

5G

Private 5G | Edge CHANNELS

4G LTE

C-RAN/Fronthaul

Gigabit Internet

Netmanias Private 5G Analysis KT Ericsson Nokia HFR

HFR Private 5G Solu on (my5G)

IPTV/Video Streaming

SK Telecom Verizon Huawei Samsung

my5G Solu on Components

IoT

SDN/NFV

Wi-Fi

KT

SK Telecom

LG U+

Network Protocol

AT&T Vodafone DT Telefonica China Mobile Optage NEC Mavenir Affirmed Metaswitch Athonet Al ostar Airspan

my5G Key Features

Samsung

Fujitsu Kyocera

Korean Ven

Microso Apresia

AWS

my5G Resources

HFR, Inc. Announces my5G™, Standalone Whole Network for Private Wireless

NETMANIAS ONE-SHOT GALLERY

Comparison of the SD-WAN vendor solu ons July 05, 2017 | By Dr. Harrison J. Son @ Netmanias ([email protected])

Comparison of the SD-WAN vendor solutions

Download PDF File

Comments (11)

Lasted Updated: July 12, 2017 (Juniper added)

15 Share

SD-WAN Solution

Velocloud

Viptela

Versa

Silver Peak Citrix

Cloud-

Secure

Versa Cloud Silver Peak

Netscaler

Delivered

Extensible

IP Platform Unity

SD-WAN

Ecessa

Nuage/Nokia

SteelConnect SD-WAN

SD-WAN

Nuage VNS

SteelConnect Network

Ecessa

VSC

Riverbed

SD-WAN

Network

SD-WAN Controller

VeloCloud

vSmart

SD-WAN

Unity

NetScaler

Policy Provisioning

Orchestrator

controller

controller

Orchestrator

SD-WAN Center Manager

SD-WAN CPE

Velocloud

Viptela vEdge

FlexVNF

Unity

CloudBridge

Edge

EdgeConnect

Talari

Controller

SteelConnect Talari

Insight Edge/PowerLink NSG

Gateway

Appliances /WANworX

Appliance

Appliance

Appliance

Appliance

Appliance

Appliance

Appliance

Appliance

Appliance

/VNF

/VNF

/VNF

/VNF

/VNF

/VNF

/VNF

/VNF

/VNF

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

2,200

3,000

2,600

10,000+

4,000

1,300

N/A

N/A

1,400

Network Performance

O (passive)

O (active)

O (active)

O (passive)

O (passive)

O (active)

O (passive) N/A

O (active)

Measurement

Proprietary

BFD

ITU-T

Proprietary

Proprietary

ICMP Ping

Proprietary

OWAMP

SD-WAN CPE Formfactor Zero Touch Provisioning No. of auto-detect applications (e.g., Skype, Facebook,…)

Y.1731 Dynamic Path Switching O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

X

O

O

X

steering (Can be different upstream O

X

O

X

O

X

O

X

O

X

O

O

X

X

X

X

X

X

O

X

O

O

X

(for VoIP)

(VoIP, real-time

Per-flow load balancing Per-packet load balancing (Link Aggregation: Use multiple links to support the same session) Unidirectional measurement and and downstream path, Asymmetric) FEC Forward Error Control for packet loss

O (dynamic,

(TCP

for VoIP)

Packet Duplication

O

Use multiple links to send

(for VoIP)

applications)

X

O (UDP

the same packet.

(for VoIP)

applications)

applications)

Data Encryption AES-256

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

Segmentation

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

N/A

O

Network slicing

Proprietary VPN

/

WAN Optimization Support

VRF at SD-

ID in IPsec packet

WAN CPE

header

O

O

VRF-lite at SDWAN CPE

O

O

O

O

(3rd party)

O

O

O (3rd party)

N/A: Not Announced O: supported X: not supported

See Also, SD-WAN traffic path control and WAN quality enhancement solutions by vendor: (2) Citrix, Netmanias Tech-Blog Netmanias Interview with Nuage/Nokia - Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN), Netmanias Report D-WAN traffic path control and WAN quality enhancement solutions by vendor (1): Silver Peak, Netmanias Tech-Blog Survey - Operator’s Managed SD-WAN Services, Netmanias One-Shot Gallery

SD-WAN TERMS | Netmanias' Definition

/

Ralph Santitoro 2017-07-11 00:56:22

/

What's the difference between an 'X' and an 'O' in the above table? Would be good for you to add a legend indicating this.

Chris Yoo 2017-07-11 12:41:41

Hi Ralph, my understanding is as follows: - X : not supported - O : supported

Nikhil Tambe 2017-09-06 01:51:06

Very nice summary, do you have details on the report ? e.g - When you say WAN Optimization support what all does it iinclude ?Compression > De-Duplication ?

gsronald 2018-07-17 07:37:12

from my opinion, if dedupe / compression, it may affect the quality of network. If running VOIP, the voice quality may be affected.

Balaji KCS 2017-12-20 00:23:24

Does SD-WAN support scenarios where the Applications accessed are in Datacenters or in cloud dcs where the CPE or any BOX cannot be installed ?. SD-WAN for the enterprise , yes i understand it wo talking about B-C (Business to CLient) scenarios. thanks, Balaji KCS

Gangdharan 2018-08-08 19:04:44

Very nice summary. Really useful for comparing products and getting good reference.

Anil Chaitanya Mandru 2018-10-11 04:18:48

Thank you for this summary. But, its more than one year old (which is an eternity in the SD-WAN old :) ). Hope we will see a update soon.

Francesco 2019-03-13 23:59:20

Wow very nice summary! What about Meraki? Why it's not considered in SD-WAN solutions?

Mick Russom 2019-04-27 00:22:10

Looking forward to an update to this excellent material. Add more vendors and add more features! Excellent information.

Bharat 2019-05-09 16:02:13

Hi can you update about merraki in this comparrison

SDWAN-MAN 2019-09-20 02:33:17

Could you please add Peplink / Pepwave to this?

Thank you for visiting Netmanias! Please leave your comment if you have a question or suggestion.

Characters

Related Contents

/

Shi of Enterprise Business from MPLS to SD-WAN

View All (518) 4G (1) 4G LTE (2) 5G (46) AI (1) ARPU (2) AT&T (1) Akamai (2) Alcatel (1) Backhaul (2) C-

Extending SD-WAN to Wireless LAN

RAN/Fronthaul (17) CDN (8) CORD (1) CPRI (1) Carrier Aggregation (2) China (2) Chin Mobile (2) Cisco(1) D-RAN (1) DHCP (1)

FTTH (6) Femto Gateway (2) Frequency (5) GiGA

Gigabit Internet (19) Google (2) HDS (1) HLS (3) HTTP A (31) IoT (9) KT (47) Korea ICT Market (28) Korea ICT Service (1) Korea ICT Vendor (1) LG U+ (32) LTE (57) LTE-A (8) LTE-B (2) MEC (6) MPLS (1) MPLS-TP (1) MWC 20 LTE (1) GiGAtopia (1)

12/10/2018 Netmanias Blog

Streaming (4) Handover (1) HeNB-GW (2) IPTV

Securing zero touch for uCPE deployments

Network Architecture (9) Netw 5G (

06/07/2018 Netmanias Blog

2016 (1) Microsoft (1) NAT (1) NTT (1) NTT Docomo (1)

Security is a many-layered thing*

WAN (2)

05/14/2018 Netmanias Blog

Streaming (14) Wi-Fi (4) Wideband LTE (1) eMBMS (6) ePDG (1)

Protocol (3) Network Slicing (1) OTT (2) On-Net CDN (3) Openflow (2) Pay TV (1) Private

SDN/NFV (19) SK Broadband (4) SK Telecom(40) Samsung (1) Transparent Cache (1) UHD (6) Verizon (1) Video

Carrier-Neutral Data Centers are the Key to Lower WAN Costs

11/09/2017 Netmanias Blog Is vCPE the new future or Cloud CPE? Is our tradi onal physical CPE s ll holding down the fort? 10/20/2017 Netmanias Blog Service Providers Are Deploying SD-WAN

10/10/2017 Netmanias Blog What Is Universal CPE? (updated at May 2018)

09/14/2017 Netmanias Blog Netmanias Interview with Juniper Networks: So ware-Defined WAN (SD-WAN)

08/01/2017 Netmanias Reports So ware and Support Op mize SD-WAN for Enterprises

07/31/2017 Netmanias Blog    

 

 

   

 

Register

|

About Us

| Sponsor Channel Service (Korean Market)

| Advertise

| Contact Us

|

LinkedIn

|

Our Korea

 

  HQ: 201, Hanho Building 33, Nonhyeon-ro 64-gil, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06228, Rep. of KOREA Netmanias USA: 5214 36th Ave. NE Seattle, WA 98105 USA

 

 

Netmanias was founded in year 2002, and provides in-depth analysis and overview of 4G & 5G mobile, IoT, SDN/NFV, Gigabit Internet and video streaming technologies as well as trends in the evolution of Korean operators’ networks and services Copyright ⓒ 2002-2018 NMC Consulting Group. All rights reserved.

 

 

 

 

/